logo



Pro Answers > Paradox Answers > Russell's Paradox

This is the archive version of www.protheory.com hosted as a mirror on my forum.

 

Discuss Russell's Paradox

 

Russell's Paradox

Introduction

Is the ultimate set of all sets a member of itself or not?

This paradox appears to be singularly unsolvable.

 

Philosophy

Russell's paradox relates to a branch of philosophy called set theory.

 

Sets

As its name suggests this theory uses the idea of categorising all parts of a problem into different sets or groups.

 

Rules

The rules for creating these sets are infinitely debatable, it depends what method you choose to divide your different objects, ideas, or answers.

 

Relative

All details are relative in other words.

 

Top of Page

 

Assumed

The sets were assumed to be hierarchical and this is where the paradox arises from.

 

Paradox

The paradox within set theory and many similar theories is whether the set of all sets is a member of itself.

 

Example

Is the word "word" a word?

 

Summary

Russell noticed it was impossible to conclusively prove beyond all doubt that the highest possible set was or indeed was not a member of itself.

 

The Problem

Is the set of all sets a member of itself or not?

 

The Answer

 

Problem

It cannot be unchangingly proven that the set of all sets is a member of itself.

 

Answers

Whichever "yes or no answer" you choose another person such as myself could state the opposite with equal conviction.

 

Top of Page

 

Three

We need to use three simultaneous answers at all relative times to be totally accurate, and to account for the fact that all energy within the universe may perform three simultaneous actions at any one time.

 

Is the set of all "sets" a member of itself?

1. The set of all sets is a member of itself.

2. The set of all sets is not a member of itself.

3. The set of all sets is neutral.

Simultaneously.

 

Am I wrong?

I simultaneously oppose, agree with, and neutralise all criticism ad infinitum.

My point is literal.

There is no point creating a theory of everything that doesn't work.

 

NEXT > Physics Answers

 

 

Interested?

If you're interested in a positive discussion about everything the whole of protheory.com is mirrored on my Theory Of Everything Forum

Discuss Russell's Paradox



logo