Pro Answers > Physics Answers > Black Holes
This is the archive version of www.protheory.com hosted as a mirror on my forum.
Black Holes
Introduction
This theory describes regions in space where the nucleus of a star is thought to have collapsed into itself due to its own gravitational pull.
The current laws of physics have no theory that can accurately describe the complete behaviour of these places.
Specialised
Black holes are thought to be specialised regions in space where the attractive pull of gravity is so strong that not even light can escape.
Fastest
Light is the fastest energy in the universe according to the accepted laws of physics.
Critical
If a stellar core reaches a certain critical mass it is assumed that it may be able to collapse into itself, creating a gravitational pull that is stronger than that of electromagnetic radiation, such as light.
Black
The name given to these regions is black hole with the implication being that there is no light able to function as it might normally do.
Top of Page
Pulled
It is assumed that light and everything else within range of the event horizon is pulled into the hole, due to the strength of the surrounding gravitational field.
Horizon
The event horizon is the point in space-time up to which the pull of gravity is stronger than light, from a physics point of view this is considered to be the point of no return.
Laws
The laws of physics break down if we try to calculate beyond this stage and this is the problem.
Summary
What happens inside a black hole?
Why do the laws of physics fail to accurately describe and explain these phenomena?
The Problem
What are black holes and why do the current laws of physics fail to explain them?
The Answer
Opposites
Black holes are the opposite to explosions, they are implosions.
Potentials
The mass or potential energy contained in any stellar core is subject to three possible potentials at the end of its life.
Top of Page
Stellar
Any stellar core may explode, implode, or a neutral potential may occur.
Physics
The current laws of physics cannot describe the idea of a black hole because they rely on unchanging constants such as the speed of light for relative measurement.
Theoretically
Black holes are theoretically more powerful than light.
Measurement
When we attempt to measure the universe using the unchanging speed of light as a constant, our observations and relative measurements are only unchanging as long as this constant itself remains unchanging.
Trouble
The moment that our constant base ceases to be constant, the singular laws of physics fail (change).
Top of Page
Stronger
When we encounter a black hole that is theoretically more powerful than light our relative laws cannot cope as light is no longer what we assumed it was.
Undone
Everything we have based upon the constant value of light is now undone.
Constants
The laws of physics are not necessarily unchanging constants and should not be regarded as such.
Can we explain black holes with the current laws of physics?
1. We can explain black holes with the current laws of physics.
2. We cannot explain black holes with the current laws of physics.
3. There is a neutral possibility.
Simultaneously.
Am I wrong?
I simultaneously oppose, agree with, and neutralise all criticism ad infinitum.
My point is literal.
There is no point creating a theory of everything that doesn't work.
NEXT > Claymath Millennium Problems
Interested?
If you're interested in a positive discussion about everything the whole of protheory.com is mirrored on my Theory Of Everything Forum